Both the reading passage and the
lecture discuss the issue of fossils related to animal tissues. The reading
passage contradicts to the lecture.
Initially, the article outlines
that the lots of tiny branching channels are found inside of the leg bone
fossil, whilst the lecture argues it, stating that soft tissue is expected to
be found in the channels are more likely to be left by bacteria.
Furthermore, the author mentions
that spheres are found in inner bone and red blood cells can be remained and in
reading passage, it’s mentions that the spheres have red centers. The professor
departs from the idea, underscoring that there is no evidence show that
creature at that time had red cells and the red centers should be something
else.
Lastly, according to the reading
passage it talks about that collagen is found on the leg bone. Collagen is a
biochemical material, which might to be an association with bone tissue;
whereas the lecture refutes it highlighting that collagen can’t live as long as
7 million year and it may be some recent material. For example, it may be from
the hand skin of the researchers.
In conclusion the professor does
not agree with the reading passage.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий