Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the issue of
hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines. The reading passage states all the
disadvantages of online encyclopedias, while the lecture casts doubt on the
statement put forward in the reading passage.
Initially, the article outlines
that the Chevalier was rich in assets but poor in cash while he was living in
Switzerland, he occasionally had to borrow funds to pay for expensive
recreational activities. Having low amounts of cash isn’t the same as being financially
poor, whilst the lecture argues it, stating that as someone
who had to borrow large amounts of money from others, the Chevalier must have
fabricated stories of his wealthy life in Switzerland.
Furthermore, the author
mentions that the
skepticism expressed in the reading regarding the reliability of the
conversation with votaries that the Chevalier recorded in his memoir. She
explains that because the Chevalier had a habit of recording each conversation
in detail even years later. The professor departs from the idea, underscoring that after every conversation,
Chevalier would write it down, and reviewed it before he wrote the memoir.
Lastly, according to the
reading passage author states that Chevalier should have bribed for freedom instead of
escaping the prison from its ceiling, whereas the lecture refutes it highlighting that bribery is impossible
because none of prisoners that had more powerful friends than he did bribed
jailors for freedom.
Hence, the lecture questions the
reading passage by provided contrasting points to it.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий